Discourse: PROSELYTISM AND GIMBA'S FICTIONS (II) - Abdullahi Ismaila Ahmed.
Gimba’s third and
fourth novels, Innocent Victims
(1988) and Sunset For a Mandarin (1991)
chronicle his civil service experiences. The novels are slickly written to
conceal details of the experience. As a student of historicism these novels are
curious to me and I longed to extract it from him the contexts which inform
their production. The questions I phrased to him on this issue were not
answered before his death. In any case, as can be seen in the novels, it is
apparent that they are vistas unto his civil service years.
Innocent Victims is an
exposé of cut-throat intrigues and machinations in the civil service
culminating in the humiliation of Haj. Faruk Kolo. In the centre of this
intrigue is Zaalim, the tribal bigot, who envies Haj. Faruk’s rise in the
service and apparent uprightness as a thoroughbred and circumspective
bureaucrat. Zaalim’s tribal bigotry manifests in his thought process. He is one
who thinks from the particular to the general. He sees himself as the vanguard
of his tribe, the one to champion the cause of his people’s marginalization in
the service. He therefore engages in petition writing falsely accusing Haj.
Faruk of financial misappropriation.
Sunset
for a Mandarin reads like a sequel to Innocent Victims. In this novel, the
lead character, Hamzah, is a stoic personality who draws sympathy by the ordeal
he is made to go through by his close ally, Waleefa. The novel is an extension
of the intriguing mischief making in the civil service that was begun in Innocent Victims. Like Haj. Faruk in Innocent Victims, Hamzah too in this
novel falls victim to the telltale of Waleefa. Like Iago in Shakespeare’s Othello, Waleefa is a villain whose
motiveless motive is born out of the belief that “men in power seldom want to see those who walk upright around them.
Often, those who crawl survive longest” (pg144).
This is the bane of
Hamzah as he becomes an object in the hands of Waleefa. The crux of Waleefa’s
grouse is that he wants the position Hamzah occupies as the Director–General,
Treasury Department. This is what sparks the rivalry between them, with Waleefa
gaining an upper-hand because of his closeness to the SMA, Commander Abbud. He
thus uses his affinity with the SMA to frame Hamzah in a case of
misappropriation of fund in the sum of 14.2 million Songainian Dollars. This leads to Hamza’s subsequent
humiliation and travails.
Gimba uses the two
novels to dramatize the malevolent nature of man, his capacity to inflict
maximum harm on his fellow man just to satisfy his capricious desires. And
having exposed that negative aspect of man, he wittingly nudges the reader to
empathize with the likes of Haj. Faruk Kolo and Hamzah and to adopt their kind
of personality. He also seems to suggest that one ought to be wary of wolves
who come in sheep skin especially in a specialized setting such as the civil
service. The ultimate lesson he conveys to the reader is such as Major Khalid’s
advice to Hamzah to:
Learn not to take things for granted
… not to take
people for granted. Discover who
your true friends
are … their real
colourings. Purge yourself of your
naivety … it’s a
hard way to learn, I know. But its
the best. The
most enduring.
His fifth novel, Sacred Apples (1996), repudiates the
notion of woman emancipation by emphasizing the place of woman in the family
structure in relation to Islamic religion and culture. Zahrah’s attempt to
escape the restrictions of family life and marriage and to live according to
the dictates of her acquired western knowledge and value comes in conflict with
the tenets of her Islamic religion and culture. According to Gimba,
The triple roles of being a woman,
wife and a mother are
weighty responsibilities, yet most
noble, demanding the
best of human
creatures. Women, by their gentle and noble
constitution are
the only people that can perform these roles,
and these are
what have made them the hub of a humane
human society.
The abdication of these
roles, especially of being wives and mothers, is what in the words of Gimba,
has produced “near-Frankenstein
creatures all over the world’. The strong message which Gimba preaches in this
novel is that the family and marriage institutions are sacrosanct and women are
the honoured molders of these institutions, and that motherhood cannot be out
sourced.
The sixth novel, Footprints (1998) is a sad commentary of
the parlous political situation in a typical developing country like Nigeria.
It examines the leadership crisis and breakdown of law and order and the
socio-economic malaise that are foisted on the helpless citizens.
By drawing attention to
these issues, Gimba wittingly emphasizes the need for African leaders to be
considerate in their rulership. He sends a strong message that the atrophy of
the society can only be redeemed if the leaders carry along the people and the
followers also behave responsibly.
A Toast in the Cemetery
(2003) is a collection of short stories which treats variegated themes. It is
as I have stated elsewhere an unequivocal statement on “the degenerating socio cultural life in Nigerian society as well as the
quest for racial amity among people of African descent in the diaspora”
(Ismaila, et al: 2008). The stories are Gimba’s way of drawing readers’
attention to the seamy side of issues which preoccupy him in the hope that in
the process they would be spurred to demand the good side.
Conclusion.
What I have tried to do
here is to make a tentative statement about Gimba’s subtle proselytisation in
his fictions. Of course, this is subject to further research and reaffirmation.
However, I am unwavering in my claim that running through Gimba’s works is an
unequivocal voice note of a preacher who nudges his readers to appreciate his
perspective, to see the good side of the seamy side of the issues he so
painstakingly wrote about.
Abdullahi Ismaila Ahmed is of the Department
of English, IBB
University, Lapai, Nigeria.
Comments
Post a Comment
We love to hear from you, share your comment/views. Thanks